CONNECTICUT Saluting (LOC)

Download this image

More from this collection

Related by Where

Research Help!

Where: Unknown

Try to find the spot where the photographer was standing.

When: 01 January 1912

Try to find the date or year when this image was made.
Bain News Service,, publisher.

CONNECTICUT Saluting

1912 Oct. 14 (date created or published later by Bain)

1 negative : glass ; 5 x 7 in. or smaller.

Notes:
Title and date from data provided by the Bain News Service on the negative.
Photo shows a naval review for President William Howard Taft in New York City, October 14, 1912. (Source: Flickr Commons project, 2009 and New York Times, October 15, 1912)
Forms part of: George Grantham Bain Collection (Library of Congress).

Subjects:
Ships

Format: Glass negatives.

Rights Info: No known restrictions on publication.

Repository: Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA, hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pp.print

General information about the Bain Collection is available at hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pp.ggbain

Higher resolution image is available (Persistent URL): hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ggbain.10795

Call Number: LC-B2- 2442-7

Info:

Owner: The Library of Congress
Source: Flickr Commons
Views: 6041
libraryofcongress dc:identifier=httphdllocgovlocpnpggbain10795 xmlns:dc=httppurlorgdcelements11 navy warship connecticut gunsalute ussconnecticut ship unitedstatesnavy usnavy usn ussconnecticutbb18 bb18 connecticutclass predreadnought predreadnoughtbattleship battleship

Add Tags
  • profile

    Harry Angstrom

    • 31/Mar/2008 03:58:24

    Article from Wikipedia is here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Connecticut_(BB-18) although this photo has differences from the other photo of the Connecticut, the bow and tower structures, for example.

  • profile

    JSleeper

    • 02/Apr/2008 07:08:29

    What was the purpose of those cage masts? They seem to be tall enough to make a target out of the ship.

  • profile

    Greeboe

    • 18/Jul/2008 03:51:51

    No radar so lookouts had to be high to see other ships and where the shots landed for fire control. Less wind hamper and visibility with the cages. My opinion with no research.

  • profile

    Greeboe

    • 18/Jul/2008 03:55:04

    Also more strength to hold up the platforms.

  • profile

    perfgeek

    • 06/Sep/2008 06:45:22

    From the date, and the proximity to other photos, looks like this was part of the 1912 fleet review: www.geocities.com/scs028a/1912List.html Indeed though the cage masts look rather different than the towers in the other photos. However, this link: www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-c/bb18.htm suggests that she had her masts altered ca 1908/1909 which would have been in time for this picture.

  • profile

    Kilted Cowboy

    • 28/Feb/2009 03:49:48

    You can pinpoint this photo to 12:10 or 12:30 pm on Monday October 14, 1912, query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9D02E4DD133CE6...